essays 2

renders and the luxury of assumption

re: shadowplays

the internet helps us view all these images of all these great works we may never see. sure, study abroad will let you see the Parthenon etc. if you pursue that, but there's limits that mismatch with our post-technological globalization. it's interesting: how educated of global architecture was the pre-internet, working architect? i mean, of course they definitely went to Rome too or something like that but there's a change there with the internet's democratization of information. anyhow my point is simply that there are endless buildings, and this isn't about how you'll never get to see them all, but rather about how being able to see them through print&digital may skew how we think about architecture, how we think about this field. again, I think the most untrained eye is attracted to the big buildings. on the way back from campus one of the routes we take passes by the charlotte national bank building, driving right by it I always look out the window and upwards towards those huge columns. scale is everything in these cases. or more examples: the UNC Charlotte DuBois Center building near that bank building. or even more prominently, all the skyscrapers populating downtown! those examples of architecture make themselves literally prominent, they aggrandize themselves with their grandiose designs, with the money that was able to finance such designs, with the labor that made such designs tangible. but somewhere — actually if you look anywhere else — you find the strip mall, you find the smaller downtown buildings, you find endless old houses draped in masonry, you find etc etc. all of that is also architecture, yes? it's just our eyes gravitate towards the "better stuff". I think another form of this is an interest in... forms. interesting unconventional forms, the kind of shapes you have no idea how theyd be built in real life. so of course, when we do see real examples of built unconventional buildings, we can be attracted to them. i definitely feel this way. again, my past projects have gotten pretty conceptual and abstract and as part of that I was specifically really getting into the works of eisenman and libeskind. I used to have a book on Deconstruction. and you just observe these works that are just as real as the local strip mall yet much more interestingly built, to the point maybe someone else you show it to may not like how complicated, messy, etc. it is. but again, not all buildings are these unicorns. those who can travel to them do so for a reason: they're pretty uncommon. not every state, city, etc. is blessed to have some mind-bending project in it. so while yes it is nice to escape and observe the great marvels, whether classical monuments or contemporary experiments, i worry that this is another case of indulgence that may not reflect what you'll do in the field. yes, I'd love to design something nearly as interesting as House III, or The Crystal, etc etc but also I accept if my future career as a designer and eventual architect does not cross those paths like confronting your own mortality I'm just confronting my own limits life is so unpredictable especially studying this profession where it feels like you only know 10% of 10% of the knowledge it demands like what would happen if any bachelors degree class of architecture students had a pop quiz on the ARE ? that'd just be cooked for us

AND I LAY HERE IN THIS VAST STUDIO, A SMALL DOT THAT KNOWS NO ONE AND NOBODY KNOWS IT EXISTING BREATHING AND TAKING RIGHT TO SPACE

statesville and woodward // THE UNITED HOUSE OF... // CAMP NORTH END // WBAB 102.3 // Gray.com

FMK ARCHITECTS // SOUTHEND 225 or 226 // MONDAY NIGHT BREWING // jli-wire viewing // WFNZ 92.7FM // LandDesign

SUGAR CREEK SERVICES CENTER // MIDNIGHT DRAGON // ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD HEADQUARTERS // PROVIDENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH // CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLOTTE // 1070 KENILWORTH AVE // ELLA B SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER // WHITE RABBIT //